Any Doc!!!!
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon

หน้า 4 จาก 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Go down

Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon - Page 4 Empty Re: Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon

ตั้งหัวข้อ  hacksecret Mon Jul 19, 2010 11:59 am

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

hacksecret

จำนวนข้อความ : 1111
Registration date : 02/03/2010

ขึ้นไปข้างบน Go down

Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon - Page 4 Empty Re: Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon

ตั้งหัวข้อ  hacksecret Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:00 pm

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

hacksecret

จำนวนข้อความ : 1111
Registration date : 02/03/2010

ขึ้นไปข้างบน Go down

Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon - Page 4 Empty Re: Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon

ตั้งหัวข้อ  hacksecret Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:02 pm

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

hacksecret

จำนวนข้อความ : 1111
Registration date : 02/03/2010

ขึ้นไปข้างบน Go down

Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon - Page 4 Empty Re: Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon

ตั้งหัวข้อ  hacksecret Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:03 pm

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

hacksecret

จำนวนข้อความ : 1111
Registration date : 02/03/2010

ขึ้นไปข้างบน Go down

Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon - Page 4 Empty Re: Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon

ตั้งหัวข้อ  hacksecret Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:05 pm

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

hacksecret

จำนวนข้อความ : 1111
Registration date : 02/03/2010

ขึ้นไปข้างบน Go down

Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon - Page 4 Empty Re: Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon

ตั้งหัวข้อ  hacksecret Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:45 pm

Russian Bear is back



TOP SECRET - PLASMA WEAPON

There are three classic states of matter: solid, liquid, and gas;
however, plasma is considered by some scientists to be the fourth state of matter
because of its unique properties. Ionized refers to presence of one or more free electrons,
which are not bound to an atom or molecule. The free electric charges make the plasma
electrically conductive so that it responds strongly to electromagnetic fields.

Plasma typically takes the form of neutral gas-like clouds (e.g. stars) or charged ion beams,
but may also include dust and grains (called dusty plasmas).[1] They are typically formed
by heating and ionizing a gas, stripping electrons away from atoms, thereby enabling
the positive and negative charges to move more freely.

The Radio Instrument Building Research Institute under the supervision of Academician A.
Avramenko developed a plasma weapon capable of killing any target at altitudes of up to
50 kilometers. Engineers and scientists of the institute in cooperation with the National
Research Institute of Experimental Physics (Arzamas-16), Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute,
and Central Machine Building Research Institute prepared a concept of the international
experiment Doverie (Trust) for testing of the Russian plasma weapon at the American
ABM testing ground in the Pacific Ocean together with the US. The cost of the experiment
was estimated at $300 million. According to Academician Avramenko, the plasma antimissile
weapon would not only cost tens times less than the American SDI, but would also be much
simpler in development and operation. The offered joint project could save expenditures on
development of its own plasma weapon for the US. The plasmoid based on the energy of
ground super-high frequency generators or laser (optical) generators creates an ionized territory
in the trajectory of a warhead and in front of it, and completely disrupts the aerodynamics of
the object's flight, after which a target leaves its trajectory and is ruined by monstrous overloads.
The killing effect is delivered to the target at the speed of light



Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon - Page 4 Icon_arrow สงคราม...แผน...มหาอำนาจ

Chinese PLA Second Artillery Corps (中国人民解放军第二炮兵部队)







According to Russian Generals a war with the United States will be a
threat in 10-15 years.

What do you think? will there be a ww3? And who
will fight who?

hacksecret

จำนวนข้อความ : 1111
Registration date : 02/03/2010

ขึ้นไปข้างบน Go down

Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon - Page 4 Empty Re: Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon

ตั้งหัวข้อ  hacksecret Mon Jul 19, 2010 2:19 pm

Wars And Lies On The World Stage - Act 1/2

George W. Bush said even knowledge could spark the west into launching World War III,
"I told people if you are interested in avoiding World War Three,
it seems you ought to be interested in preventing them [IRAN] from having
the KNOWLEDGE necessary to make a nuclear weapon." - White House, October 2007.

This 20 minute Wise Up Journal and We Are Change Ireland film shows the build up
to World War III is in place waiting for the right spark and exposes the hypocrisy of
the United Nations. This film Proves using main stream media it's self that Georgia,
a state backed by the U.S. and NATO, launched a disgraceful attack on the Russian
population of South Ossetia. The U.S. leaders on both sides are exposed as shills by
using their own words. The powerbrokers, war advisors, behind the scenes are brought to
the front reveling how the grand chessboard of the globe has mobilised it's supporters to
begin World War III against Russia, Pakistan, Iran and perhaps even U.S.
built up China and India.


The U.S and other nations have stated since 9/11 that the use of pre-emptive nuclear war
is its prerogative. Surely after the devastating chaos of nuclear world war III between nations
a resounding call will rise to end nationalism and for the UN to be given greater power
and control than WWII handed to them in order for sustainable peace (no opposition).


A December 2007 NATO sponsored report states, "The first use of nuclear weapons
must remain in the quiver of escalation as the ultimate instrument to prevent the use
of weapons of mass destruction
"

This film shows how the hypocritical United Nations in it's current form is being used
as a tool by globalists to bring nations out of their control, "rogue states", under their system.
The UN will be used as a tool until the time comes, perhaps after the chaos of WWIII,
when the UN is "required" to be given greater international powers and control.


---"Although the [UN] Security Council did not vote approval of the U.S.-British attack,
it helped set it up by inflating the Iraq threat and failing to confront the real threat posed
by the United States and Britain. Then, within two months after "shock and awe,"
the Security Council voted to give the aggressor the right to stay in Iraq and manage its affairs,
thereby approving a gross violation of the UN Charter after the fact."

"Since July 31, the Council has demanded that Iran "suspend all enrichment-related and
reprocessing activities, including research and development" —despite the fact that Iran's right
to engage in these activities is guaranteed under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of
Nuclear Weapons."

"the International Atomic Energy Agency has never shown Iran's program to be
engaged in any kind of activities other than peaceful ones"

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=5248
---
The U.S. nuclear posture review gave America "authority" to use pre-emptive nukes.
This encouraged other nations, such as Great Britain, France and Russia,
to declare they may also use nuclear weapons in "conventional" warfare.

"People who talk of outlawing the atomic bomb are mistaken —
what needs to be outlawed is war." Leslie Richard Groves

"National disarmament is a condition -- for effective UN control"

Obama's Vice Presidential nominee Joe Biden said, "And for the last seven years,
the administration has failed to face the biggest the biggest forces shaping this century.
The emergence of Russia, China and India's great powers."

Obama's Vice Presidential nominee Joe Biden said, "once again see the consequences of the neglect,
of this neglect, of Russia challenging the very freedom of a new democratic country of Georgia.
Barack and I will end that neglect. We will hold Russia accountable for its action."




hacksecret

จำนวนข้อความ : 1111
Registration date : 02/03/2010

ขึ้นไปข้างบน Go down

Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon - Page 4 Empty Re: Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon

ตั้งหัวข้อ  hacksecret Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:08 pm

David Icke The Comning Third World War 19.4.09

David Icke The Comning Third World War - Will it be a nuclear one!!
1340 Days left for Age of Transition to begin!
Fasten your seat belts!

There are prophecies and oracles from around the world that all seem to point to
December 21, 2012 as New World Age ( World is not going to end but millions of people
will die in the process of New Age Transition).
The ancient Mayan Calendar,
the medieval predictions of Merlin, the Book of Revelation and the Chinese oracle of
the I Ching all point to this specific date as the end of civilization. A new technology called
The Web-Bot Project makes massive scans of the internet as a means of forecasting the future
and has turned up the same dreaded date: 2012. Skeptics point to a long history of
Failed Doomsdays, but many oracles of doom throughout history have a disturbingly
accurate track record.









แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย hacksecret เมื่อ Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:24 pm, ทั้งหมด 3 ครั้ง

hacksecret

จำนวนข้อความ : 1111
Registration date : 02/03/2010

ขึ้นไปข้างบน Go down

Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon - Page 4 Empty Re: Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon

ตั้งหัวข้อ  hacksecret Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:14 pm

Russian Nuclear weapons Forces



แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย hacksecret เมื่อ Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:33 pm, ทั้งหมด 1 ครั้ง

hacksecret

จำนวนข้อความ : 1111
Registration date : 02/03/2010

ขึ้นไปข้างบน Go down

Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon - Page 4 Empty Re: Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon

ตั้งหัวข้อ  hacksecret Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:16 pm

Hiroshima & Nagasaki-Original 1945 Documentary

[youtube][/youtube]

hacksecret

จำนวนข้อความ : 1111
Registration date : 02/03/2010

ขึ้นไปข้างบน Go down

Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon - Page 4 Empty Re: Nuclear War: A Guide To Armageddon

ตั้งหัวข้อ  hacksecret Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:25 pm

The War Game

The War Game is an Academy Award-winning documentary on nuclear warfare
that was made by Peter Watkins in 1965 and was subsequently suppressed
by the BBC until 1985. It remains largely unknown despite its historical importance,
its high quality, and the looming gravity of its subject.

Speaking of censorship, the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107 states:

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work,
including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified
by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including
multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors
to be considered shall include—

(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature
or is for nonprofit educational purposes;

(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;

(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted
work as a whole; and

(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use
if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

With regards to the first factor, this is indeed being used for non-profit educational purposes
(it's a documentary on a free website). With regards to the second, in Time Inc. v. Bernard Geis
Associates the court ruled that public interest is one of the factors involved in establishing fair use.
As the documentary itself makes clear, it is in the public interest for there to a much better
understanding by the public of nuclear war, and while this documentary is not the only way of
educating the public, there is such a large gap between it and the alternatives that the facilitation
condition in the third sentence of paragraph 134 of the above decision clearly applies.
Moreover, in a democracy it is also clearly in the public interest to combat censorship.
Peter Watkins supports the dissemination of his documentary; it was the British government,
via the BBC, that suppressed it for decades and that would be making any claims of copyright
infringement today. With regards to the third, it is well known that complete reproductions
may be considered fair use if other factors are strong enough. With regards to the fourth,
the more dissemination this gets, the more people know about the documentary,
and the more people that know about it, the more are likely to buy it.

My uploading it is therefore consistent with fair use.

[youtube][/youtube]

hacksecret

จำนวนข้อความ : 1111
Registration date : 02/03/2010

ขึ้นไปข้างบน Go down

หน้า 4 จาก 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

ขึ้นไปข้างบน

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
คุณไม่สามารถพิมพ์ตอบ