The Search for Planet X : นักดาราศาสตร์ได้คำตอบเริ่มต้น อะไรจุดระเบิด “ซูเปอร์โนวา”

หน้า 5 จาก 15 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 10 ... 15  Next

Go down

Re: The Search for Planet X : นักดาราศาสตร์ได้คำตอบเริ่มต้น อะไรจุดระเบิด “ซูเปอร์โนวา”

ตั้งหัวข้อ  eye in the sky on Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:46 am

04.22.95

Q: (L) Okay, you said at that time that a Transdimensional Atomic Remolecularizer
was buried at Oak Island. Is that correct?
A: Yes.


Q: (L) Who buried it there?
A: Learn. You already have tools. We are trying to teach you to use
your most precious commodity.


Q: (L) And that is, of course, our minds?
A: You betcha!


Q: (L) What I read about Oak Island was that there were legends of lights
being seen there prior to 1703.
A: Yes.


Q: (L) Prior to 1703 would put the burial of whatever is there at least prior to that time, correct?
A: Yes.


Q: (L) Were those lights the lights of craft of other beings other than the natives of this planet?
A: Electromagnetic profile.


Q: (L) What was noticed when the kids arrived on the Island was that a limb was sawed off
of a tree over the depression and there were marks of the rope and pullys had been utilized.

(T) If something more advanced dug the pit, they wouldn’t have used chain hoists and pullys.
(L) That is what I am getting at. So, if there was evidence of this kind of stuff on the tree,
it would seem to indicate that somebody had been doing something there who was a little more
human or limited in their technology, is that correct?
A: Yes.


Q: (L) Now, my thought is that, it is beyond human technology to have produced
that pit at that point in history?
A: Beyond known technology.


Q: (L) And yet humans may have been involved in that activity?
A: Bingo. Some humans have always communed with "higher" powers.
We are speaking of conscious communion in this and other and instances.


Q: (L) When was the pit dug?
A: 1500s. Nationality is not issue. Access sect information. Now, who claimed communion,
Laura has in memory banks from absorption of mass reading practice.


Q: (F) Was there a sect from that era that claimed communion?
A: Yes.


Q: (L) I think that this may have had something to do with the people that later
became known as the Cajuns, a French religious sect that was living there...
They called it Arcadia.
A: Maybe.


Q: (L) Now, this article says that it would have taken a hundred men working
every day for six months to have built this pit...
A: No.


Q: (L) The article also says that it must have been dug in 1780...
A: No.


Q: (L) When at one point they drilled into the pit, some bits of gold came up and
a piece of parchment and maybe some other odds and ends. What were these?
A: Alchemy is your clue.


Q: (T) The remolecularizer made it.
(L) Why not? If these people were involved in doing this, why did they do it?
A: Instructed to do it.


Q: (L) They were instructed by the higher powers they were in contact with, correct?
A: Yes.


Q: (L) What did they intend to do with it once it was there?
Did someone intend to come back for it at some point in time?
A: No.


Q: (T) Is it buried there in that location for a specific reason?
A: Sure.


Q: (T) Does the location itself have something to do with the purpose of it?
A: Magnetic.


Q: (T) Are there other ones buried on the planet?
A: Yes.


Q: (T) Are they aligned to each other on the planet in some kind of geometric pattern?
A: Maybe.


Q: (T) Do they all work together?
A: Maybe.


Q: (J) Can you tell us where some of the other ones are?
A: Use mind, that is what it is there for. [/size]


Q: (T) We are using our minds. And, we are talking to you about this. We are friendly.
A: Shortcut city. It’s not nice to fool Mother Cassiopaea!

Q: [Laughter] (T) Mirth! If we were to follow the coordinates where this thing is buried,
would it lead us to others?
A: Try it and see. When L__ said he wanted to hunt for buried treasure,
do you think he had this in mind? All the clues are there for you to find
if you do your homework!


Q: (L) Okay. I want to get back to the function of this thing. You suggest it is buried
not to be dug up. It is actually buried to stay there? Is that correct?
A: Yes.


Q: (L) Then that explains a lot of things about the way it was buried.
It is claimed that there was found, at a certain level, a rock with carving on it.
It was destroyed through carelessness. I am curious as to what this said.
A: Measure marker.


Q: (J) Could it be possible that this device was somehow related to
the crystal pyramid principle of Atlantis?
A: In a small sense.


Q: (L) Is this device continuously operational?
A: No.


Q: (L) What stimulates it to go into operation? That is, assuming it does.
A: Magnetic anomalies.


Q: (J) Is it affected by earthquakes?
A: Can be.


Q: (L) Are these magnetic anomalies ones that occur naturally on the planet?
A: Both.


Q: (L) So, they can occur naturally on the planet or they can be generated or
stimulated by some other source?

A: Yes.


Q: (J) Is this device a doorway for entry into this dimension?
A: Can be used as such.


Q: (T) Is it a stand-alone machine or is it to be used in conjunction with others?

]A: Either.

07.08.95

Q: (L) Next question: In reading about crop circles; I know that we have been told that
they come from sixth density, but I would like to know the exact mode or mechanism
by which they are made.
Is it like electromagnetic imprinting, is it like a whirlwind.
Can you tell us a little bit about how they are actually physically created?
A: Field transfer.

Q: (L) What kind of field?
A: Magnetic.


Q: (L) Are they transferred directly from sixth density to third density?
A: No.


Q: (L) Are they manifested by an object that has come into third density,
such as a craft of some sort?
A: No.


Q: (L) Can you give us a clue here?
A: We can give "clue." See Hoagland.


Q: (L) What does Hoagland say?
](T) He says that basically what we see in this density is a 3rd dimension reflection of 4thdimension
and that it can be seen mathematically by looking at the cloud patterns on the different planets.
If there was not another dimension above us, circular would be circular and the circular motion
of the clouds would be maintained, but if it is a transfer from fourth density to third density,
when you are looking at a fourth density object, what the third density version of it would look like
would show a hexagonal figure with angles to it, and that the photographs from the Voyager Probe
that show that the cloud patterns from the North and South poles of most of the planets
are not circular, they are hexagonal. Something like that, anyway.

(L) Okay, in sixth density, what are crop circles?
A: Thoughts.


Q: (L) Who is thinking these thoughts?
A: Yours truly.


Q: (L) Okay, if they are thoughts...

(J) They are messages so they could be thoughts before they are messages.
(T) Well, they have described sixth density as pure energy, therefore there is nothing
physical in sixth density to reflect back through the densities. So the only thing that
can come from there to here is thought. Because, that is all there is there.

(L) So, it is a field transfer of thought.
(T) So, when sixth density thinks and they pass that down, most likely skipping fifth density
to fourth density, and then stepping down from fourth to third, we end up with
a three dimensional crop circle. But what does a crop circle look like in fourth density?
A: "Look" is not point. You need visual stimuli in order to remember.
Yours is a physical dependent existence. Your media resists, why? Suggest discussion.


Q: (L) The media resists crop circles and I know this is so because when I went
to the Library to research them, there was not a single, solitary book, magazine or
article on the subject of crop circles in the entire county system.

(J) There wasn’t anything in Barnes and Noble either.
(L) Now, the two books on the subject I do have, I had to order special.
Why would the media resist crop circles?

(S) The same reason they resist everything else.
(F) But, they don’t resist everything else as much as crop circles.
(L) Here is something I got of the net recently. [reads]
"To some people, the circles which began appearing about a decade ago
represent the handiwork of extraterrestrial invaders or crafty tradesmen
bent on mischief after an evening at the pub, or even hordes of graduate students
driven by mad professors. To others, the circles suggest the action of microwave
generated ball lightening, numerous whirlwinds or some other peculiar
atmospheric phenomena. These scenarios apparently suffered a severe blow late
last summer when two elderly landscape painters, David and Doug admitted to
creating many of the giant, circular wheatfield patterns that cropped up over
the last decade in southern England.


The chuckling hoaxers proudly displayed the wooden planks, ball of string,
and primitive sighting device they claimed they had used to construct the circles.
But this newspaper orchestrated, widely publicized admission didn’t settle
the whole mystery. Gerald Hawkins, a retired astronomer who now divides his time
between an apartment in Washington and a farm in Woodville, felt compelled to write
last September to Dave and Doug, asking how they managed to discover and
incorporate a number of ingenious, previously unknown, geometric theorems of
a type that appear in antique textbooks, into their "artwork" in the crops.
He concluded his letter as follows:

"The media did not give you credit for the unusual cleverness
behind the designs and the patterns."

And then he says that he is finding ratios of small whole numbers that precisely match
the ratios defining diatomic scale. These ratios produce the eight tones of an octave
in the musical scale corresponding to the keys on the piano."

That was surprise number one, he said. He began looking for geometrical relationships
among the circles, rings and lines and then he found that measurements reveal that
the ratio of the diameter of the large circles is drawn so that it passes through the centers
of the three original circles to the diameter of one of the original circles, and is close to 4 to 3.
What he discovered were geometric relationships which simply are not taught anymore
in the modern math. And yet, essentially he says that these guys that came forward and
claimed that they did it could not possibly have done it.
(F) Well, the thing that is so strange to me is that since 1992 there hasn’t been any reporting
in the American media about this phenomenon at all.

(L to TF) Is there any way you could check that? [Tom is a reporter with a major newspaper.]
(TF) I already have.
(L) You have? What have you found?
(TF) There’s a lot.
(L) What is it and what does it say? When?
(TF) I didn’t notice the dates. I didn’t notice if there was any turned out after 1992...
(F) There’s not...
(TF) I liked my photo so much I had someone check it out. One of the librarians.
Some things you call up you get material that is that thick... this is only this thick.
[Indicates file thickness large to small] But I don’t know what years any of it is.

(F) Well, it is not after 1992, I can assure you because I have been keeping very close track.
(TF) I know it hasn’t been in the news. I don’t remember seeing anything in the news
for several years.

(F) It hasn’t been here, but it has been in Britain.
(TF) Right!
(F) It is very strange when we are hooked up to the cable news channels that
there has been a television black-out on it here. The other thing is Linda Howe
showed the new ones from 1994 and they are more spectacular than any that have appeared.
Now, if these artists are still going around doing this...

(L) Well, I hate to get paranoid, but, do you suppose this Dave and Doug were set up
to make this claim so that the media would have an answer they could tout and
then just drop the whole thing? If so, why?

(F) Because it’s too frightening. I remember in 1991 and 1992 this thing was heating up
and heating up.

(TF) That’s true.
(F) It was unusual because this type of subject matter is usually not attended by
the mainstream media to any great extent. When there is a big UFO wave there might be
a little blurb about strange lights reported by various people. This subject was actually
focused upon by all of the major networks, it was on all of the major wire services,
it was everywhere. All of a sudden, these two drunken artists appeared and they all said:
"Oh! That’s it! Okay, forget about it." That was so strange because my impression of journalists
has always been, at least it used to be, that they want to dig up the truth, and here, mere placebo,
surface type explanations that don’t explain anything and which are not adequate, suddenly
caused them to lose interest. It would be like Watergate: "Oh, the 18 minute gap... well,
Mary what’s-her-name stepped on the pedal. Oh, okay, no problem!"Obviously that didn’t happen!
This just didn’t make logical sense for those of us who had looked at the crop circles,
and even people who don’t follow this type of subject matter closely, who I have talked to,
people who brush off the subject of UFOs, have told me that this explanation just doesn’t add up!
These two guys did all of this under the noses of thousands of researchers who were trying like
the dickens to see anything that happened in the middle of the night - in the middle of this,
a simple, ridiculous if you get right down to it, explanation is offered and the whole subject is
brushed off?!

(J) And, the explanation would only work if the crop circles were within their physical reach
logistically speaking.

(F) Well, not only that, if you have ever calculated what is involved, they started in 1973
with just a handful throughout the summer and by 1992 it was hundreds all over the planet.
These guys would have to be working non-stop, 24 hours a day, flying all around the globe...
[laughter] ...and I thought, how can they accept this brush-off explanation? The other thing is,
you would expect, obviously if that were the true explanation, as crazy as it seems,
if they could actually, physically do this all by themselves, which is physically and
mathematically impossible, but never mind that; it has happened since then. If these two guys
are pulling a hoax and nobody is going to pay any more attention, why would they bother to
continue to do it each and every summer since that time. Wouldn’t somebody catch them by now?
There are just a hundred arguments against this explanation that come to mind.
Yet, in this country it is completely ignored. My own theory is that it is too sensitive an issue.
Here is something that can be photographed.

(L) It proves that there is somebody else out there.
(F) It doesn’t prove it...
(J) there’s something else going on...
(F) I don’t think it proves it, but it makes it very hard to ignore. As I have stated before,
my father was a physicist and he was also a skeptic. A very brilliant man...
when we would see on television... I remember one night in particular,
we saw a very comprehensive segment on crop circles, and he actually got angry
when I pointed out to him that this phenomenon seemed awfully bizarre,
awfully intense, widespread and so on. He tried to brush it off: "Oh, I think it is a fad,"
were the words he used. This is a scientist!
(L) He dove headfirst into the deepest river in the world! Denial.
(F) Like a whirlwind is going to form a pattern like an intricate geometric figure?
Come on! Sure! He grasped that whirlwind theory and when I pointed out to him
that this was not logical, he got angry which I perceived as fear.
Being very defensive because it stabbed into the heart of his whole life’s work.

(L) That right there is the answer, culturally speaking.
(F) Exactly!
(L) It stabs into the heart of materialism.
(F) In this country somebody does not want this to be reported on because
you can’t brush it off. You can brush off UFOs... well, not if you really study the issue,
but if you don’t pay too much attention to it you can brush it off...

(J) Because there is no physical evidence. You have evidence with crop circles.
They are there. You can see them.

(L) And, they are astonishing! Just to look at them is astonishing!
(F) Any of them, really, except for the very simplest ones, I mean, just using pure,
simple logic, who would have the time, the energy, the expertise to do these things...

(J) And to do it in the dark, without any light...
(F) And in just short periods of time! It just doesn’t make sense. Just imagine,
Mr. F, it is your assignment to go out into the wheat fields of England,
in the dark and to make this intricate figure...

(TF) I would ask them to do it for me and show me how they did it!
(F) Right!
(S) I don’t know if it was Sightings or Encounters, but one time they had a segment
on crop circles in Mexico, and they even appear on rock cliffs...

(F) Yes, and it’s happening in Puerto Rico. And, the alleged report on this one was
that Army type vehicles came in and destroyed it so people couldn’t see it.
Which leads me to believe, with my suspicious mind, that somebody doesn’t want
this stuff going on, for whatever reason.
(L) Yes, what are you going to do with a population that suddenly asks you:
"Well, you’re in charge; what is this? What’s going on?" And, you can’t answer them.
You have lost credibility as the authority.

(F) And, none of the answers you can come up with are safe. It offends the church
because they can’t explain it. It offends the scientific community because they can’t explain it.

(L) Yes, the church calls everything they can’t explain "The Work of the Devil."
(T) Which one?
(L) We think we have come up with an answer. Are we anywhere on the right track?
A: Maybe.


Q: (L) Anything further you would like to add to what we have said?
A: No.

06.15.96

Q: (L) As you know, I have been studying the Sufi teachings, and I am discovering
so many similarities in these Sufi "unveilings" to what we have been receiving through
this source, that I am really quite amazed, to say the least. So, my question is: could
what we are doing here be considered an ongoing, incremental, "unveiling," as they call it?
A: Yes.


Q: (L) Now, from what I am reading, in the process of unveiling, at certain points,
when the knowledge base has been sufficiently expanded, some sort of inner unveilings
then begin to occur. Is this part of the present process?
A: Maybe.


Q: (L) My experience has been, over the past couple of years, that whenever there is
a significant increase in knowledge, that it is sort of cyclical - I go through a depression
before I can assimilate - and it is like an inner transformation from one level to another.
Is there something we can do, and if so, is it desirable, to increase or facilitate
this process in some way?
A: It is a natural process, let it be.


Q: (L) One of the things that Al-Arabi writes about is the ontological level of being.
Concentric circles, so to speak, of states of being. And, each state merely defines relationships.
At each higher level you are closer to a direct relationship with the core of existence,
and on the outer edges, you are in closer relationship with matter. This accurately explicates
the 7 densities you have described for us. He also talks about the "outraying" and
the "inward moving" toward knowledge. My thought was certain beings,
such as 4th density STS, and other STS beings of 3rddensity, who think that they are
creating a situation where they will accrue power to themselves, may, in fact, be part of
the "outraying" or dispersion into matter. Is this a correct perception?
A: Close.


Q: (L) Al-Arabi says, and this echoes what you have said, that you can stay in
the illusion where you are, you can move downward or upward. Is this, in part,
whichever direction you choose, a function of your position on the cycle?
A: It is more complex than that.


Q: (L) Well, I am sure of that. Al-Arabi presents a very complex analysis and
he probably didn’t know it all either... Nevertheless, in many places it is almost
a word-for-word reflection of things that have been given directly to us through this source.
A: Now, learn, read, research all you can about unstable gravity waves.


Q: (L) Okay. Unstable gravity waves. I’ll see what I can find.
Is there something more about this?
A: Meditate too! We mean for you, Laura, to meditate about unstable gravity waves
as part of research.


Q: (L) Okay. Would it be alright to ask a few more questions about the Sufis?
A: Not unless you wish to get off the track.


Q: (L) That would be off the track from the way we are moving at present?
A: Not until you have memorized Sufi teachings to the extent that
you can cross reference with Bible and similar works.

Q: (L) Okay. So, we are onto something with the Sufi teachings. But, we don’t need to
get off the track. I guess that they did with the Koran what some other mystics have done
with the Bible. It is clear that there is something under the surface of it, but it is corrupted
and twisted. And, I was convinced by seeing this underlying pattern that it was possible
to penetrate the veil, and that gave me the impetus to push for a breakthrough.
A: Unstable gravity waves unlock as yet unknown secrets of quantum physics
to make the picture crystal clear
.


Q: (L) Can we free associate about these gravity waves since no bookstores
are open at this hour? Gravity seems to be a property of matter. Is that correct?
A: And....


Q: (L) And hmmmm....
A: And antimatter!


Q: (L) Is the gravity that is a property of antimatter "antigravity?"
Or, is it just gravity on the other side, so to speak?
A: Binder.


Q: (L) Okay. Gravity is the binder. Is gravity the binder of matter?
A: And... Gravity binds all that is physical with all that is ethereal through
unstable gravity waves!!!


Q: (L) Is antimatter ethereal existence?
A: Pathway to. Doorway to.


Q: (L) Are unstable gravity waves... do unstable gravity waves emanate from 7th density?
A: Throughout.


Q: (L) Do they emanate from any particular density?
A: That is just the point, there is no emanation point?


Q: (L) So, they are a property or attribute of the existence of matter,
and the binder of matter to ethereal ideation?
A: Sort of, but they are a property of anti-matter, too!


Q: (L) So, through unstable gravity waves, you can access other densities?
A: Everything.


Q: (L) Can you generate them mechanically?
A: Generation is really collecting and dispersing.

06.22.96

Q: (L) One of the crop circles you interpreted was an "astronomical twin phenomenon."
What is an astronomical twin phenomenon?
A: Many perfectly synchronous meanings. Duplicity of, as in "Alice through the looking glass."


Q: (L) Double images. Does this relate to matter and antimatter?
A: Yes, and...


Q: (L) Gravity and manifesting on one side and manifesting a mirror image on the other...
A: Yes, and... Astronomical.


Q: (L) Okay, that relates to stars and planets... astronomical in terms of another universe,
an alternate universe composed of antimatter?
A: Yes, and....


Q: (L) Is this alternate universe of antimatter the point from which phenomena occur
or are manifested in our universe?
A: More like doorway or "conduit."


Q: (L) Is this alternate universe the means by which we must travel to 4th density?
Is it like a veil, or an abyss of some sort?
A: Think of it as the highway.


Q: (L) Is something going to happen in terms of interacting with this antimatter
in order to bring about some sort of transition to a new universe?
A: No. Realm Border is traveling wave.


Q: (L) Okay, you say "traveling wave," and then you say that antimatter is the highway.
Does this mean moving through antimatter or interacting in some way with antimatter
via the the impetus of the traveling wave, or realm border?
A: Bends space/time, this is where your unstable gravity waves can be utilized.


Q: (L) Utilizing antimatter by creating an EM field, which destabilizes
the gravity wave, allows antimatter to unite with matter, creating a portal
through which space/time can be bent
, or traveled through via this "bending."
In other words, producing an EM field, bringing in the antimatter,
IS the bending of space/time? Is that it?
A: Yes.


Q: (L) Unstable gravity waves... antimatter... destabilizing the gravity waves through
EM generation allows the antimatter to interact with matter which then creates a portal...
is it in the antimatter universe that all this traveling back and forth is done by aliens
when they abduct people?
A: Close. They transport through it, but most abductions take place in
either 3rd or 4th density.


Q: (L) Is this movement through the antimatter universe, is this what people perceive
in their abductions as the "wall of fire?" The coming apart. The demolecularizing?
A: No. That is TransDimensional Atomic Remolecularization.

Q: (L) Okay, if a person were passing into the antimatter universe, how would they perceive it?
A: They wouldn’t.


Q: (L) Why?
A: No space; no time.


Q: (L) Antimatter universe has no space and no time... so, the antimatter universe
is possibly where the poor guys of flight 19 are stuck?
A: Yes.


Q: (L) And you can get stuck in this place?
A: Yes. And if you are in a time warp coccoon, you are hyperconscious, i.e.
you perceive "zero time" as if it were literally millions of years, that is if the cycle
is connected or closed, as in
"Philadelphia Experiment."

08.11.96

Q:! (L) Is this Mars Rock in the news leading up to some definite, overt interaction with aliens?

(T) They told us, we know it, yes!
A: Gradually.


Q: (T) That’s what it’s all about. Now if they want to go to Mars to look for civilizations
and stuff, which they’re going to lead up to, and back to the moon here, and all this,
and they’re going to make Hoagland feel really good, because he’s right!
A: Notice how you heard nothing about the Mars Probes until the rock announcement?
The excavation robot spacecraft. One Probe is already on its way, another to follow.
No further explanation about "loss" of Mars Explorer.


Q: (L) What did happen to the Mars Explorer?
A: Blacked out. You see, ’Too risky.’ And too much too soon,
due to pressure from Hoagland and others.


Q: (T) My own opinion is that they’ve already been there, and they know what’s there.
A: No. Microbes are easier to swallow than humans in togas!

Q: (T) Cleopatra and Antony are not going to go over real big this week!
Especially with the Bible scholars.

(F) And the scientists! OK, you just mentioned that somebody from this planet
already launched a Mars Probe. A new Mars Probe, that no one in public knows about.
Because it’s never been talked about. So, it’s a secret probe. Who does it belong to?
A: Was secret US government.


Q: (J) When did it go up?
A: September of 1995.


Q: (T) Last September, a year ago. So, it’s gone for a year. It takes it a year,
two years to get there? Maybe not that long. So, it’s over half-way there at this point.
A: Yes. Next year.


Q: (T) Next year for the next probe?
A: Yes.


Q: (T) Is this going to be one of those public ones? A publicly announced one?
A: They both are.


Q: (T) What is the purpose of these probes?
A: Excavation to display living organisms.


Q: (T) Display?
(L) Yes, for public consumption. In other words, not only do we have a rock now,
that shows evidence that there was...

(T) Oh, display, as when they find it and dig it up, they’re going to show it on camera!
(L) Yes!
(T) Connie Couric will interview it!
(L) Right!
(F) First they said they found no evidence, then they said it was inconclusive...
Now, who the hell knows what they found! In revealing things, we’ll start with
fossilized life, and then move on...

(L) So, they’re going to display the discovery of living organisms on Mars to take
the next step to acclimate...
A: Yes.


Q: (L) So, in other words, this process is going to be something of an on-going thing,
and that all of these people who are cranking around about, you know, alien landings...
A: No faces, though.


Q: (L) There’s not going to be any ’Faces On Mars?’ They are not going to show us...
A: Won’t be revealed, what do you think happened with Mars Explorer?
Hoagland forced their hand.


Q: (T) What do we think happened to the Mars Explorer? I think they switched channels.
They just moved it from one communication post to another, and it’s doing exactly
what it’s supposed to be doing. And they did it in such a way, that the NASA people
really didn’t know what happened, so that when they were asked, they could say,
’We don’t know what happened to it!’ Because they really don’t know what happened!

(L) When we’re talking about this dealing with these Mars Explorers - is all this stuff,
or most of this stuff, coming from the 4th density manipulations of human minds, rather than...
A: Yes.


Q: (L)... rather than actual, physical entry and doing of deeds? Is that it?
A: Yes.


Q: (T) I have a question. They’re going to display live organisms, like, how did they put that
’Living organisms’? How big are these living organisms going to be? How advanced?
A: Teeny-tiny.


Q: (T) So, we’re still talking about microscopic organisms here?
A: Yes.


Q: (J) So, they won’t wave at us!
A: But these will be alive. Can’t you see the progression here?
"Don’t want to scare Grandma Sally Bible Thumper/Stockmarket Investor!"

08.17.96

Q: (L) All right, let’s get on to our questions here. Let me ask about the tetrahedron.
Terry, you ask it, because you know more about it.

(T) The Tetrahedron, triangle mathematics that Hoagland is working with in conjunction
with the Mars/Cydonia region where he supposedly discovered this...
A: Energy consolidator. EM Wave capturer.


Q: (T) Ok, so it’s an EM wave capturer. Does it also emit EM waves?
A: Close. Channels and enhances, when used properly, and in pristine conditions.


Q: (T) Hoagland is not talking about... whatever he’s talking about, as far as
the mathematics go, of the tetrahedral triangles within the sphere, which I’m assuming
this planet is calling the sacred geometries, but are physics-type things of different densities,
which may not actually be right. OK, this doesn’t apply just to Mars, this is, every sphere
has these same properties...
A: Yes.


Q: (T)... a golf ball, a base ball; I know they’re not perfect spheres, they have dimples;
all the way up to the sun, and so forth and so on, of any size, made out of any material,
as long as it’s a sphere, it will have the same properties.
A: No. Must be magnetized.


Q: (T) OK, it’s a magnetized sphere; something that has a magnetic field around it.
A: Yes.


Q: (L) Is the tetrahedral configuration a property of the magnetism?
A: No.


Q: (T) OK, my question is, the sphere has to be able to generate a magnetic field,
like the earth has a magnetic field, like Mars generates a magnetic field...
A: Or be magnetized by installation of internal magnetic generator.


Q: (L) OK, what’s the purpose of this? What’s the purpose of these tetrahedrons?
What are the...
A: Purpose is not proper term. It is a reflection of universal balance.


Q: (L) OK, well, this guy J__ says that they are designated by different monuments
on the planet’s surface...
A: Nonsense!!! Artificial constructed tetrahedrons are placed on strategic locations
on the planet’s surface in order to utilize magnetic fields properly.


Q: (L) Who places these artificially constructed tetrahedrons at these points?
A: The artificial constructors.


Q: (L) And who are they?
A: Whomever they may be. Nineteen degrees north and south.

Q: (T) Those are the numbers that Hoagland came up with, with his stuff. On most of
the planets, and our sun, we seem to have major events happening, or have happened...
A: Hawaii.


Q: (T) Yes, Hawaii, Puerto Rico... let’s see, 19 degrees north and south, Phillipines,
I think, is somewhere close, on the south side. Major volcanos...

(F) Phillipines is on the north side, that’s not in the Southern Hemisphere...
(T) I’d have to pull out a global map to see what the 19 degrees are.
On Mars, Cydonia resides at approximately 19 degrees, the Giant volcano,
the dead volcano on Mars is approximately 19 degrees, the stuff that they found on Venus,
the major things, are at approximately 19 degrees. The sunspots are approximately 19 degrees,
the red spot on Jupiter...

(L) Do the tetrahedrons spin within the sphere? Do these power points of the tetrahedron spin?
A: Energy fields flow in balance.


Q: (T) Is there... now, am I correct in the fact that there’s a direct relationship here
to the real Hebrew Star of David, to these tetrahedrals?

A: Yes.


Q: (T) Yes. So that that symbol is not a religious symbol, as such, but a very important...
(L)...power symbol.
A: Yes. So is pentagon.


Q: (T) So is the Pentagon? These are part of what humans describe as the sacred geometries.
A: Yes. You as Atlanteans knew this, and lived by it in many ways. For example,
the pyramid recharges by capturing exactly half the energy points, thus allowing
a positive imbalance buildup to be captured, then expended.

avatar
eye in the sky

จำนวนข้อความ : 141
Registration date : 18/02/2010

ดูข้อมูลส่วนตัว

ขึ้นไปข้างบน Go down

Re: The Search for Planet X : นักดาราศาสตร์ได้คำตอบเริ่มต้น อะไรจุดระเบิด “ซูเปอร์โนวา”

ตั้งหัวข้อ  eye in the sky on Tue Mar 16, 2010 11:42 pm

"That's Impossible!" (2009)

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/montauk/esp_filadelfia_1.htm



byNoel Huntley
from NoelHuntley Website

In the '30s the covert government (military) sought invisibility technology.
Scientists were called upon to develop a technology which could make objects invisible,
such as airplanes or ships. Some of the greatest brains were recruited: Einstein, Tesla,
Von Neumann
(mathematician). It appeared hardly likely though that human technology
was advanced enough to achieve the 'cloaking' phenomenon required. In fact at that time this was
the case and it was the Zeta aliens who provided the final details for a system to create invisibility.

Today we have the stealth technology which is claimed to be radar invisibility but in fact is
light invisibility. Airplanes, in particular, can be cloaked. Cloaking is quite an apt word since
the stealth technology is not five-sense invisibility. Invisibility is created by using powerful
electromagnetic fields to curve space around the object. Light thus bends around the object
and the object cannot be seen.




The military and scientists set up the battleship U.S. Eldridge with an electromagnetic system:

Tesla
coils, etc. but aided by the Zetas. What the covert government didn't know was that
the Zetas were merely exploiting them for their own ends. The aliens provided a hidden technology
which would create a wormhole, a rift or tear in spacetime.


In 1943 the first successful test of invisibility was achieved but much to the amazement of the military
and scientists the ship completely disappeared. When it returned the military insisted on using
a crew the next time in order to gain information on what happened when it disappeared.


It has been recorded that Tesla objected at this point and either resigned or even attempted
sabotage and was removed from the project. The ship disappeared and returned,
and the horrific effects of this have become fairly well known: insane crew with some of them
embedded in the hull of the ship.




Little known to the humans the experiment had to be conducted in August, 1943
as organized and influenced by the Zetas. This was due to magnetic cycles that
occur every 20 years in which a magnetic peak allowed easier transit across certain
dimensional bands of frequencies. For example, the electrical overtone (one pole of
the electrical/magnetic vortex) of D3 (dimensional band) connects with that of
the magnetic base tone of D4, creating a magnetic window.


These particular Zetas are the Zeta-Grey Rigelians from the star system Rigel in Orion.
The Guardian Alliance refer to them as the Futczhi. Zeta-Dracos are also involved as go-
betweens in humans and Futczhi relations. They motivated the government to create
the experiment in 1983.


The ship was temporarily teleported to a future time, to 1983, another magnetic peak.

The Zetas had succeeded in creating a wormhole (a vortex interconnecting
dimensions and times)
as part of their plan for expanding their implant grid system
and also creating spacetime pathways to the phantom matrix (a separated, walled-off
astral realm; a slow-acting black hole, the abode of the dark forces).

In addition, the Zetas used this dimensional window to bring in a fleet of spacecrafts,
secretly, to position them for directing coded electromagnetic D1 pulses at the Sun.
This can be achieved via astral dimensions within our Earth into the D2 Earth body of
which its centre is connected to the Sun centre through inner-space geometry.

The purpose was to misalign the Sun/Earth energy relationship which they accomplished,
and further to misalign Earth and parallel Earth (Tara) where D1 (Earth) connects to D4 (Tara).
(Earth is D1, D2, D3; Tara is D4, D5, D6.)

This would create a repulsion zone between Earth and Tara and prevent ascension
at the closing of the planetary time period of 26,556 years. We would then have to continue
to reincarnate in repeated cycles.

The result of the pulses directed at the Sun was to reverse the magnetic polarity into electrical
at the D1 level, causing the D1 vortices of Earth and Sun to repel. They also reversed
the D4 frequencies so that Earth would repel Tara - and further this would cause
misalignment in the other dimensions D2, D3, D5, D6.

This violation of the harmonic balance between these planets and Sun caused
increasing Sun flares between 1943 and 1972.
Astronomers became very concerned
about the dangers to Earth. In fact they predicted an explosion on the Sun by
about 1972 which would continue, with the possibility of destroying all life on Earth.


Fortunately the Sirian Council of the Guardian Alliance intervened. From theETs' point of view
in 1972 there would have been a red pulse released from the Sun, destroying all life on Earth.
The D1 frequency band corresponds to red in the spectrum; hence the name red pulse.
It is an intense expanding wave of ultralow frequency energy.

On August 7, 1972 scientists recorded the most intense flare ever but it was a puzzle as to
why it subsided. The Sirian Council had in fact intervened. The Sun's vortices were
out of balance but the correction was a major task and lengthy. A temporary solution was
to create a frequency fence around Earth to prevent resonance from the red pulse and
subsequent destruction of all life.
This procedure is described in the article on the so-called
"11:11".

In spite of the Zeta's plan of disrupting the alignment of the Sun, Earth and Tara, and preventing
ascension being thwarted, they nevertheless had succeeded in creating their wormhole in 1943,
a key item for a series of three such endeavors;
the other two at magnetic peaks in 1983 and 2003. The
Montauk books detail the events of 1983
in which the secret government were again induced and deceived into creating a time machine
linking 1983 to 1943 expanding and strengthening the 1943 wormhole.
The third experiment must be conducted in 2003, the last magnetic peak before 2012
and the ascension period.
The government must again be deceived into performing
another experiment which would reinforce the Zeta's implant network
sufficiently to form an effective frequency fence for the whole population
,
preventing the major aspects ofthe ascension from occurring.

The 1983 wormhole widened the rip of 1943 and linked the time periods successfully to their
Dracos-Zeta D4 time period - their base of operations. Note that these Zeta plans were
a hindrance to the competing alien faction
, the
Anunnaki, in their One World Order agenda
and they attempted to block the plan. The expanding wormhole network strengthened its
connection to the Phantom Matrix (also through their Falcon wormhole, and this so-called
Montauk vortex grid system can now radiate psychotronic mind control directives to the population).

The ET information in this article came from the Guardian Alliance material - A. Deane's Voyagers books

http://www.maximilliendelafayettebibliography.com/zeta_reticuli_and_anunaki_descen.htm










เบื้องหลังอิลูมินาติที่ติดต่อกับมนุษย์ต่างดาว

http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/

http://www.r2iclubforums.com/forums/showthread.php/15947-Malta-s-temple-Global-Warming-etc

Mystery of 11:11

The Number 11
Some interesting observations

11 August 1999 at 11:11 am there was a total solar eclipse.

21 December 2012 at 11:11 am the Mayan calendar ends.

In the astrological sense with the precision of equinoxes & the 26,000 years cycle of Earth
wobbling through the 12 signs of zodiac we are moving in to the new age of Aquarius and
Aquarius is the 11th astrological sign.

Returning to pyramid numerology and the significance of the number 11:
1234321 = 11:11 x 11:11
121 countries = 11:11
11 fatalities
In binary 11 stands for 3, which is the trinity. 11 x 3= 33. 33 is the number of 33rd degree mason.

The first plane that hit the world trade centre was flight 11.

Total number of crew on flight 11 was 11.
New York State is the 11th state of the US constitution.

September 11, 2001 is 11 years from 2012.
The world trade centre commenced building in 1966 and finished in 1977. It took 11 years to build.

On September 11, 1990 at 9:09 pm (11 years prior to September 11, 2001)
Bush Sr. made the very first speech entitled “towards the New World Order” at the UN.

Going back 60 years in time, on 11 September 1941 soil was broken to lay
the foundation of Pentagon.


The American NASA project to the moon was Apollo 11.

On the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month, Remembrance Day is celebrated in Britain.

The word crown was derived from Anglo French word caroon, which is derived from
the Latin caroona. The year the word crown was first established was 1111 AD.

The 1972 Munich Olympics provided the first world stage for global terrorism and
the inclusion of the significant number '11' was anything but a coincidence.

11 Israelis were killed by Black September (the 9th month 9/11), a group with ties to
Yasser Arafat’s Fatah organization.

The Olympics were host to 121 countries. 121 divided by 11 gives 11.

Read more about this mystery of 11:11 here ==>>
http://www.december212012.com/articles/11-11/The_11_11_phenomenon.htm

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1760518/alien_species_2_greys_and_reptilians/

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/andromeda/esp_andromedacom_7d.htm

http://www.nicap.org/articles/hillzeta.htm

Zeta Reticuli Aliens/ Bob Lazar 1/4